Tel: +998977838464
Search

№ 2 (2026)
Marketing

Articles

SANOAT IQTISODIYOTIDA KOʻP MEZONLI OPTIMALLASHTIRISH YONDASHUVLARI

Опубликован 2026-02-28

Авторы
Moʻminova DildoraDilshadovna
pdf (узбекский) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Аннотация

Maqolada sanoat korxonalarida koʻp mezonli optimallashtirish metodlarining metodologik asoslari nazariy jihatdan tahlil qilingan. Analitik iyerarxiya jarayoni (AHP), TOPSIS, VIKOR va maqsadli dasturlash metodlarining konseptual mohiyati hamda ularning sanoat iqtisodiyotidagi tatbiq imkoniyatlari koʻrib chiqildi. Pareto optimallik tamoyillari asosida ziddiyatli maqsad funksiyalari oʻrtasidagi muvozanat muammosi tahlil qilindi. Resurslarni taqsimlash, ishlab chiqarish rejalarini asoslash va investitsion qarorlarni optimallashtirishda koʻp mezonli yondashuvlarning afzalliklari koʻrsatildi. MCDM metodlarining qiyosiy tavsifi amalga oshirildi hamda ularni sanoat sharoitida qoʻllashning metodik yoʻl-yoʻriqlari ishlab chiqildi. Maqola xulosasi koʻp mezonli optimallashtirishning sanoat iqtisodiyotida qaror qabul qilish sifatini oshirishga qoʻshadigan hissasini asoslab berdi.

Библиографические ссылки

  1. 1.Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
  2. 2.Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSS.2008.017590
  3. 3.Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182-197. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/996017
  4. 4.Opricovic, S. and Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
  5. 5.Roy, B. (1991). The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision, 31(1), 49-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
  6. 6.Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4615-5563-6
  7. 7.Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1961). Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. Vol. 1-2. Wiley, New York.
  8. 8.Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  9. 9.Coello Coello, C.A., Lamont, G.B. and Van Veldhuizen, D.A. (2007). Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. 2nd ed. Springer, New York. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2
  10. 10.Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L. (1999). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4), 257-271. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/827413
  11. 11.Bellman, R.E. and Zadeh, L.A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), B-141-B-164. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока недоступны.