Tel: +998901234567
Search

No. 6 (2025)
Marketing

Articles

FOREIGN IN IMPROVING REGIONAL INNOVATION POLICY

Published 2025-06-30

Authors
Gʻaniyev Sanjar Poziljon oʻgʻli
Affiliation
Teacher of Namangan State Technical University
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the possibilities of institutional adaptation of foreign experiences in improving regional innovation policy. The study analyzes the innovation policy models of the European Union, South Korea, China, and Finland, identifying mechanis ms for their effective integration at the regional level. Special attention is given to aligning these international practices with the context of Uzbekistan —particularly the Namangan region —by focusing on governance modernization, strengthening institutio nal cooperation between the state, academia, and business, and enhancing innovation infrastructure. The article explores institutional barriers, legal harmonization mechanisms, and the socio -economic conditions influencing policy adaptation. As a result, a conceptual model for institutional adaptation is proposed to improve regional innovation systems and foster sustainable innovation -driven growth.

Keywords

regional innovation policy, foreign experience, institutional adaptation, regional economy, Triple Helix model, innovation management, cluster policy, Uzbekistan, Namangan region, technopark infrastructure, international integration

References

  1. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  2. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  3. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  4. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place - Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  5. European Commission. (2022). Horizon Europe: Research and Innovation Programme 2021 –2027. Brussels.
  6. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  7. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  8. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945 –974.
  9. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local “Sticky” and Global “Ubiquitous” Knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77 –86.
  10. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional Innovation Systems: Current Discourse and Unresolved Issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133 –153.
  11. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place - Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  12. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  13. European Commission. (2022). Horizon Europe: Research and Innovation Programme 2021 –2027. Brussels.
  14. World Bank. (2023). Innovation and Regional Competitiveness: Global Lessons for Emerging Economies. Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.