Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM BASED ON QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITY INDICATORS

Affiliation
Bozorova Muazzam Hamid, daughter of Tashkent International Financial Management and Technology University, teacher, TDIU independent researcher, teacher of Yangi Asr University, TDIU independent researcher, Abstract This article presents a methodology developed based on a comprehensive approach to evaluate the quality of the higher education system based on quantitative and qualitative indicators. In the study, a system of indicators was formed that allows for a deep analysis of the activities of higher education institutions of Uzbekistan, combining international experience and the national context. The proposed methodology covers the evaluation of the quality of education, the potential of professors and teachers, the level of students' knowledge, scientific and research activities, the material and technical base, and the effectiveness of spiritual and educational work. This approach serves to identify the internal capabilities of higher education institutions, prepare personnel ready for global competition, and steadily increase the quality of education. Keywords: quality of higher education, quantitative indicators, methodology for evaluating quality indicators, global competitiveness, educational programs, spiritual educational works, international standards

Abstract

603 This article presents a methodology developed on the basis of a comprehensive approach to assess the quality of higher education systems using quantitative and qualitative indicators. The study introduces a system of indicators that enables an in - depth ana lysis of the activities of higher education institutions in Uzbekistan, combining international experience with national context. The proposed model covers areas such as the quality of the educational process, faculty qualifications, studentsʼ knowledge le vels, research activities, material and technical infrastructure, and the effectiveness of moral -educational work. This approach contributes to identifying internal capacities of universities, preparing globally competitive specialists, and ensuring the co ntinuous improvement of education quality.

Keywords

higher education quality, quantitative indicators, qualitative indicators, assessment methodology, global competitiveness, educational programs, moral -educational activities, international standards


References

  1. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5 -
  2. European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). (2015). Brussels: EURASHE.
  3. OECD (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  4. UNESCO (2018). Handbook on Measuring Equity in Education. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  5. Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism. International Institute of Islamic Thought.
  6. Hazelkorn, E. (2015). Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World -Class Excellence. Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Marginson, S. (2016). Higher Education and the Common Good. Melbourne University Press.
  8. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. UNESCO Publishing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.