Tel: +998977838464
Search

Son 9 (2024)
Marketing

Ilmiy maqolalar

MINTAQADA INNOVATSION SIYOSATNI AMALGA OSHIRISHNING

Betlar 483-493

Nashr etilgan 2024-11-30

Mualliflar
Sanjar Poziljon o'g'li G'aniyev
PDF Google Scholar Google Scholar

Annotatsiya

Mazkur maqolada mintaqada innovatsion siyosatni amalga oshirishda institutsional tizimning shakllanish jarayoni va tarmoqlararo integratsiya modelining nazariy-huquqiy hamda amaliy asoslari keng tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda “Triple Helix” konsepsiyasi asosida davlat, ilm-fan va biznes sektori oʻrtasidagi oʻzaro hamkorlikni kuchaytiruvchi institutsional mexanizmlar ishlab chiqiladi. Namangan viloyati misolida mintaqaviy innovatsion siyosatni samarali tashkil etish uchun zarur boʻlgan institutsional muvofiqlik, boshqaruvning ochiqligi va tarmoqlararo integratsiya jarayonlarining iqtisodiy taʼsiri tahlil qilinadi. Tahlillar natijasida innovatsion boshqaruvning koʻp darajali tizimi, moliyaviy ragʻbatlantirish vositalari va klaster yondashuv asosida shakllanayotgan yangi mintaqaviy modelning ilmiy asoslari aniqlanadi.

Kalit so'zlar

innovatsion siyosat, mintaqaviy iqtisodiyot, institutsional tizim, tarmoqlararo integratsiya, “Triple Helix” modeli, Namangan viloyati, davlat–xususiy sheriklik, ilmiy salohiyat, texnoparklar, innovatsion boshqaruv, klaster siyosati.

Adabiyotlar ro'yxati

  1. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory
  2. of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  3. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock –
  4. Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  5. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place-
  6. Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  7. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 29-oktabrdagi “Ilm-fanni
  8. 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida” PF–6097-son
  9. Namangan viloyati hokimligi. (2023). Viloyat innovatsion rivojlanish
  10. koʻrsatkichlari boʻyicha yillik hisobot. Namangan.
  11. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance:
  12. Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  13. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory
  14. of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From
  16. National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–
  17. Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
  18. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the
  19. Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.
  20. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place-
  21. Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  22. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock
  23. – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  24. European Commission. (2022). Horizon Europe: Research and Innovation
  25. Programme 2021–2027. Brussels.
  26. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The
  27. Integration of Local “Sticky” and Global “Ubiquitous” Knowledge. Journal of
  28. Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.
  29. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional Innovation Systems: Current
  30. Discourse and Unresolved Issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153.
  31. Ahn, J. (2021). Impact of Innovation City Projects on National Balanced
  32. Development in South Korea. MDPI.

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.