RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT SHAROITIDA KORXONALARNING STRATEGIK BOSHQARUV SAMARADORLIGINI OSHIRISH METODOLOGIYASI

Marketing — 10-son, oktabr 2026

Annotatsiya

Maqolada raqamli iqtisodiyot sharoitida korxonalarning strategik boshqaruv samaradorligini oshirish metodologiyasi nazariy jihatdan oʻrganildi. Integrativ adabiyotlar sharhi va nazariy sintez orqali resurslarga asoslangan yondashuv, dinamik qobiliyatlar hamda raqamli biznes strategiyasi birlashtirildi. Raqamli resurslarning strategik natijalarga aylanishini tushuntiruvchi konseptual model ishlab chiqildi. Strategik muvofiqlik, oʻzlashtirish salohiyati va tashkiliy ambidekstrlik modelning muhim shartlari sifatida belgilandi. Vositachilik, moderatorlik va qayta aloqa munosabatlarini ifodalovchi beshta tadqiqot taklifi shakllantirildi. Asosiy omillarni miqdoriy baholash uchun normallashtirilgan koʻrsatkichlar hamda vaznlarga asoslangan integral indeks taklif etildi. Raqamli loyihalarni strategik maqsadlar va xodimlar kompetensiyalari bilan uygʻunlashtirish yoʻnalishlari yoritildi. Modelni soʻrovnoma va panel maʼlumotlarida tekshirish, indeks barqarorligini baholash hamda korxonalararo qiyosiy tadqiqotlarni rivojlantirish istiqbollari belgilandi.

Kalit so'zlar

: raqamli iqtisodiyot, strategik boshqaruv, boshqaruv samaradorligi, dinamik qobiliyatlar, raqamli resurslar, strategik muvofiqlik, oʻzlashtirish salohiyati, tashkiliy ambidekstrlik, integral indeks.


Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
  2. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  3. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
  4. Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
  5. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159-1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
  6. Zhou, Q., Yu, H., Adams, K., Attah-Boakye, R., & Johansson, J. (2025). Uncovering the impact of digital technologies on strategising: Evidence from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(3), 375-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12387
  7. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  8. Mithas, S., Ramasubbu, N., & Sambamurthy, V. (2011). How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043496
  9. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z
  10. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
  11. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
  12. Hess, T., Matt, C., Benlian, A., & Wiesböck, F. (2016). Options for formulating a digital transformation strategy. MIS Quarterly Executive, 15(2), 123-139. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol15/iss2/6
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  14. OʻReilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
  15. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
  16. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1-2), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  17. MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
  18. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  19. Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141(1), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
  20. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
  21. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.