Tel: +998901234567
Search

No. 4 (2025)
Marketing

Articles

MODERN SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES TO ECOLOGICAL AND GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR CITY AGGLOMERATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

Published 2025-04-30

Authors
Irgashev Shavkatbek Turdiyevich
Affiliation
Advisor to the mayor of Tashkent
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between urbanization processes and the ecological -geological situation across regions of Uzbekistan. Key indicators include population density, life expectancy, air pollution levels, and urban population. Using statisti cal and spatial approaches, risk and stability indices were developed. The results indicate a strong correlation between environmental pressure and demographic load. The research provides practical insights for regional planning and environmental risk assessment.

Keywords

urbanization, ecological risk, demographic pressure, indicators, regional analysis, index, planning 652

References

  1. Jaʼfarov, O. (2025). Axloqiy inqiroz va global madaniyat. Oʻzbekiston axborot va madaniyat jurnali.
  2. Soliyev, B. (2021). Aholi geografiyasi va demografiya asoslari. Namangan: NamDU.
  3. Numanova, Z. (2024). Shahar aglomeratsiyalari va ularning rivojlanish xususiyatlari. Geografik tadqiqotlar.
  4. Ibragimov, I. I., & Najmiddinova, G. O. (2024). Urbanizatsiyaning taʼsiri shahar rivojlanishiga. Toshkent arxitektura qurilish universiteti ilmiy axboroti.
  5. Dai, R., Xiao, C., Liang, X., Jia, L., Jia, Y ., & Yao, J. (2025). Evaluation of ecological geological environment carrying capacity. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598 -025-85761 -1
  6. Chen, W., Zhang, X., & Liu, X. (2024). Ecosystem services and security pattern of Tianshan Mountains. GeoChina Journal.
  7. Trinder, J., & Liu, Q. (2020). Assessing environmental impacts of urban growth using remote sensing. Geo-spatial Information Science, 23(2), 105 –119.
  8. Chun, L. (2020). Geo -ecological coordination and sustainability in Chongqing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, 102492.
  9. Hamilton, H. (2015). Ten dimensions of environmental modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 66, 94 –103.
  10. Xu, K., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y . (2011). Urban construction suitability in Hangzhou. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(4), 307 –315.
  11. Wahba, M., & El -Hussiny, M. (2025). GIS -AHP -based construction site suitability assessment. Journal of Infrastructure Systems.
  12. Shinwari, M. I., Ahmad, I., & Waseem, M. (2025). Groundwater contamination risk in Islamabad using GIS -DRASTIC. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
  13. Daneshvar, M. R., Bagheri, S., & Ayoubi, S. (2019). Urban sprawl and regional climate change in Mashhad. Ecological Processes, 8(1), 1 –12.
  14. Degefu, M., & Asefa, Y . (2024). Landfill site selection using AHP in Arerti. Environmental Systems Research.
  15. Mohammed, Y ., Ahmed, R., & Qadir, A. (2025). Groundwater recharge zones in NE Iraq. Scientific Reports.
  16. Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2014). Global urban expansion and its environmental impacts. In Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (pp. 23 –38). Springer.
  17. Batty, M. (2012). Smart cities and big data: Concepts, technologies and applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  18. Beatley, T. (2011). Biophilic cities: Integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
  19. Wang, D., Liu, Y ., Zhang, Y ., & Li, Y . (2019). Ecological security pattern in Beijing -Tianjin -Hebei. PeerJ, 7, e7306.
  20. Rees, W. E., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints and sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4 –6), 223 –248.
  21. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Davlat statistika qoʻmitasi. Stat.uz rasmiy portali. https://stat.uz

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.