Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

TERRITORIAL ASPECTS OF THE EFFECTIVE USE OF INVESTMENT ATTRACTIVENESS IN THE BUKHARA REGION

Abstract

Mazkur tadqiqotda Buxoro viloyatining investitsion jozibadorligidan samarali
foydalanishning hududiy jihatlari tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot davomida investitsion
salohiyat, infratuzilma rivojlanishi, iqtisodiy resurslar, turizm imkoniyatlari va
institutsional omillarning hududlar kesimidagi ta’siri baholandi. Integral indeks,
SWOT tahlil va investitsiya samaradorligi mezonlari asosida hududlarning investitsion
holati o‘rganildi. Natijalar Buxoro shahri, Qorako‘l va Kogon hududlari yuqori
investitsion faollikka ega ekanligini ko‘rsatdi. Ayrim tumanlarda mavjud salohiyatdan
foydalanish imkoniyatlari aniqlanib, ularni iqtisodiy rivojlantirish yo‘nalishlari
belgilandi. Tadqiqot hududiy muvozanatni ta’minlash, investitsiyalar samaradorligini
oshirish, sanoat va xizmatlar sohasini rivojlantirish hamda mintaqaning
raqobatbardoshligini kuchaytirishga xizmat qiluvchi amaliy tavsiyalarni shakllantirdi. 

Keywords

investitsion jozibadorlik, hududiy rivojlanish, Buxoro viloyati, investitsiya samaradorligi, integral indeks, iqtisodiy salohiyat, infratuzilma, turizm, investitsiya siyosati, raqobatbardoshlik.


References

  1. 1. Central Bank of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Macroeconomic and
  2. external-sector report 2024 (foreign direct investment: USD 11.9 billion; FDI/GDP:
  3. 10.3%). Tashkent: CBU. cbu.uz
  4. 2. National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan;. (2025).
  5. Investments in fixed capital of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2024 (foreign investment
  6. UZS 333.8 trln ≈ USD 26.4 bln, +65.5%; sectoral shares: manufacturing 35.7%,
  7. electricity and gas 19.5%, mining 17.1%). Tashkent: stat.uz.
  8. 3. National Statistics Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Foreign
  9. investment inflows by sector and region, 2024. Tashkent: stat.uz.
  10. 4. U.S. Department of State. (2025). 2024 Investment Climate Statements:
  11. Uzbekistan. Washington, D.C.
  12. 5. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A
  13. restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies,19(1), 1-31.
  14. 6. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free
  15. Press.
  16. 7. Perroux, F. (1950). Economic space: Theory and applications. The Quarterly
  17. Journal of Economics, 64(1), 89-104.
  18. 8. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  19. 9. UNCTAD. (2024). World Investment Report 2024. Methodology of the Inward
  20. FDI Performance and Potential indices. Geneva: United Nations.
  21. 10. The impact of foreign and domestic investment on the economic development of the Bukhara region. (2025). Studying the Progress of Science and Its Shortcomings.esiconf.org/index.php/SPOFS/article/view/4065.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.