Tel: +998977838464
Search

No. 9 (2024)
Marketing

Ilmiy maqolalar

MINTAQALAR IJTIMOIY-IQTISODIY RIVOJLANISHIDAGI NOMUTANOSIBLIKLARNI BARTARAF ETISHDAGI XORIJIY TAJRIBASI

Pages 434-441

Published 2024-11-30

Authors
Alisher Jobir o'g'li Ismoilov
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

The article provides an in-depth analysis of the experience of foreign countries in eliminating disparities in the socio-economic development of regions. The causes of disparities in regional development and advanced foreign experiences in eliminating them are considered. In particular, based on the experience of developed countries such as Germany, Japan, South Korea, China, the USA, Northern European countries (Sweden, Denmark, Norway) and Asian countries (Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan), the main methods and tools used to reduce interregional differences are identified. Models used in foreign countries in the form of public-private partnerships, clustering, digital transformation, and regional growth poles are analyzed, and practical proposals are developed for their use in the conditions of Uzbekistan.

Keywords

socio-economic development, regional imbalances, regional economy, foreign experience, public-private partnership, clustering, digital transformation, growth poles, Germany, Japan, Northern Europe, South Korea.

References

  1. Jahon banki. World Development Report 2022: Finance for an Equitable
  2. BMT Taraqqiyot Dasturi (UNDP). Human Development Report 2021-22:
  3. Uncertain Times, Unsettled Lives.
  4. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti 2022-yil 28-yanvardagi “2022-2026-
  5. yillarda Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi mintaqalarini rivojlantirish strategiyasi
  6. toʻgʻrisida”gi PF-60-son qarori.
  7. Appalachian Regional Commission (AQSh). FY 2021 Performance and
  8. Accountability.
  9. Shagaida, N., & Lerman, Z. (2008). Land Reform and Development of Land
  10. Markets in Russia. ResearchGate, 2008, 128.
  11. Caspian Policy Center. (2024). Implementing the K-Silk Road: South
  12. Koreaʼs Growing Commitment to Central Asia. Caspian Policy Center, 2024.
  13. Joint Economic Committee. (1983). Industrial Policy, Economic Growth and
  14. the Competitiveness of U.S. Industry. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983, 150.
  15. Oireachtas Library & Research Service. (2020). Overview of Freeports or
  16. Free Zones. Oireachtas Library & Research Service, 2020, 30.
  17. European Commission. (2024). Albania 2024 Report — Enlargement and
  18. Eastern Neighbourhood. European Commission, 2024, 120.
  19. Cravo, T. et al. (2015). The Brazilian Regional Development Funds and
  20. Economic Growth: A Spatial Panel Approach. UNU-WIDER, 2015, 28.
  21. ResearchGate. (2018). The Regional Development in Germany.
  22. ResearchGate, 2018, 25.
  23. Toktaş, Y., Sevinç, H., & Bozkurt, E. (2013). The Evolution of Regional
  24. Development Agencies: Turkey Case. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series
  25. Oeconomica, 2013, 31–40lar.
  26. MIDA. (2024). Iskandar Malaysia: A Strong and Sustainable Metropolis of
  27. International Standing. MIDA, 2024.
  28. Itai, Y. et al. (2024). Environment for Startups in Japan and Initiatives in
  29. the Regional Japan. Bank of Japan Review, 2024, 24-E-5

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.