Tel: +998977838464
Search

No. 9 (2024)
Marketing

Ilmiy maqolalar

MINTAQADA INNOVATSION SIYOSATNI AMALGA OSHIRISHNING

Pages 483-493

Published 2024-11-30

Authors
Sanjar Poziljon o'g'li G'aniyev
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the institutional framework for implementing innovation policy in the regions and the theoretical foundations of the intersectoral integration model. Based on the “Triple Helix” concept, the study explores institutional mechanisms that enhance cooperation among government, academia, and business. Using the case of the Namangan region, the paper examines the effectiveness of regional innovation policy, institutional coherence, and the economic impact of intersectoral integration. The results propose a multi-level innovation management model focused on developing cluster structures, ensuring governance transparency, and fostering innovation-driven growth.

Keywords

innovation policy, regional economy, institutional system, intersectoral integration, Triple Helix model, Namangan region, public–private partnership, scientific potential, technoparks, innovation management, cluster policy.

References

  1. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory
  2. of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  3. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock –
  4. Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  5. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place-
  6. Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  7. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 29-oktabrdagi “Ilm-fanni
  8. 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida” PF–6097-son
  9. Namangan viloyati hokimligi. (2023). Viloyat innovatsion rivojlanish
  10. koʻrsatkichlari boʻyicha yillik hisobot. Namangan.
  11. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance:
  12. Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
  13. Lundvall, B. A. (2016). National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory
  14. of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
  15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From
  16. National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–
  17. Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.
  18. Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the
  19. Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974.
  20. OECD. (2023). Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place-
  21. Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  22. UNDP. (2023). Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock
  23. – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York.
  24. European Commission. (2022). Horizon Europe: Research and Innovation
  25. Programme 2021–2027. Brussels.
  26. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: The
  27. Integration of Local “Sticky” and Global “Ubiquitous” Knowledge. Journal of
  28. Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86.
  29. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional Innovation Systems: Current
  30. Discourse and Unresolved Issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153.
  31. Ahn, J. (2021). Impact of Innovation City Projects on National Balanced
  32. Development in South Korea. MDPI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.