Tel: +998977838464
Search

No. 3 (2026)
Marketing

Articles

«YASHIL ENERGETIKA»DAN FOYDALANISHNING XORIJ TAJRIBASIVA OʻZBEKISTON AMALIYOTIDA JORIY ETISH YOʻLLARI

Published 2026-04-03

Authors
Saidov Mashʼal Samadovich
pdf (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

Mazkur ilmiy maqolada «yashil energetika»dan foydalanishning xorij tajribasi va
uni Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi amaliyotida joriy etish imkoniyatlari tahlil qilingan.
Tadqiqotda 2020-2024 yillar davomida Xitoy, Germaniya, Hindiston va Birlashgan
Arab Amirliklarida qayta tiklanuvchi energiya quvvatlarining oʻsish dinamikasi
statistik maʼlumotlar asosida oʻrganildi. Quyosh fotoelektrik va shamol energetikasi
boʻyicha jadvallar shakllantirilib, ularning oʻsish surʼatlari, institutsional mexanizmlari
va investitsiya modellari tahlil qilindi. Maqolada xorij tajribasidan kelib chiqqan holda
Oʻzbekiston sharoitida quyosh va shamol energetikasini bosqichma-bosqich
kengaytirish, davlat-xususiy sheriklik mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish, tarmoq
modernizatsiyasi va energiya saqlash tizimlarini joriy etish boʻyicha ilmiy asoslangan
takliflar ishlab chiqildi.

Keywords

yashil energetika, qayta tiklanuvchi energiya manbalari, quyosh fotoelektrik, shamol energetikasi, auksion mexanizmi, energetik transformatsiya, davlat-xususiy sheriklik, energiya samaradorligi, tarmoq modernizatsiyasi, energetik xavfsizlik.

References

  1. 1. Jacobsson S., Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system
  2. transformation-explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology.
  3. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256-276. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.029.
  4. 2. Lauber V., Mez L. (2004). Three Decades of Renewable Electricity Policies in
  5. Germany. Energy & Environment, 15(4), 599-623. DOI: 10.1260/0958305042259792.
  6. 3. Hoppmann J., Huenteler J., Girod B. (2014). Compulsive policy-making-The
  7. evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power. Research Policy, 43(8), 1422-1441. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.014.
  8. 4. Lipp J. (2007). Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from
  9. Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 35(11), 5481-5495.
  10. 5. Butler L., Neuhoff K. (2008). Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction
  11. mechanisms to support wind power development. Renewable Energy, 33(8), 1854-1867. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.10.008.
  12. 6. Stokes L. C. (2013). The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of
  13. feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy, 56, 490-500.
  14. 7. Couture T., Cory K., Kreycik C., Williams E. (2010). An analysis of feed-in
  15. tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment. Energy Policy, 38(2), 955-965.
  16. 8. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2015). Renewable Energy
  17. Auctions: A Guide to Design. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.
  18. 9. Del Río P. (2017). Designing auctions for renewable electricity support: Best
  19. practices from around the world. Energy for Sustainable Development, 41, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.006.
  20. 10. Winkler J., Magosch M., Ragwitz M. (2018). Effectiveness and efficiency of
  21. auctions for supporting renewable electricity - What can we learn from recent
  22. experiences? Renewable Energy, 119, 473-489.
  23. 11. IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change.
  24. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (AR6 WGIII). Geneva: IPCC.
  26. 12. Steinhilber S., Ragwitz M., et al. (2014). Auctions for Renewable Energy in
  27. the European Union (policy/analysis paper).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.