Tel: +998977838464

No. 9 (2026)
Marketing

Scientific articles

UY-JOY FONDINI KOMPLEKS BOSHQARISH TIZIMINI RIVOJLANTIRISHNING XORIJIY TAJRIBASI

DOI 10.67668/mj/2026iss9/2005 Pages 461-470

Published 2026-09-07

Authors
Nurimbetov Ravshan Ibragimovich a , Kaxramonov Xurshidjon Shuhrat oʻgʻli b
Affiliations
a Toshkent arxitektura-qurilish universiteti
b Shahrisabz davlat pedagogika instituti
Marketing jurnali — 2026-yil sentabr, 9-son
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

The article examined international experience in integrated housing stock management and its adaptation to Uzbekistan. Systemic, institutional and comparative approaches were applied to practices in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Spain, the United States, Poland and Finland. Institutional, technical, financial, service, energy, information and strategic management functions were systematised. The analysis highlighted the distribution of responsibilities among owners, professional managers and service providers. Priorities were identified for professional qualifications, financial transparency and digital reporting. Proposals addressed owner participation, service competition and the preservation of buildingsʼ technical condition. Selective adaptation of international models was emphasised, with attention to accountability and coordination among participants.

Keywords

housing stock, integrated management, international experience, professional management, owner participation, financial transparency, digital reporting, institutional adaptation

References

  1. Blandy, S., Dupuis, A., & Dixon, J. (Eds.). (2010). Multi-owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-7566-2
  2. Yau, Y. (2011). Homeownersʼ participation in management of multi-storey residential buildings: The Hong Kongʻs case. Property Management, 29(4), 345-356. DOI: 10.1108/02637471111154791
  3. Ho, D.C.W., & Gao, W. (2013). Collective action in apartment building management in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 38, 10-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.09.001
  4. Johnston, N., & Too, E. (2015). Multi-owned properties in Australia: A governance typology of issues and outcomes. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 8(4), 451-470. DOI: 10.1108/IJHMA-02-2015-0005
  5. Gao, L.W., & Ho, D.C.W. (2016). Explaining the outcomes of multi-owned housing management: A collective action perspective. Habitat International, 57, 233- 241. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.08.005
  6. Muczyński, A. (2023). Collective renovation decisions in multi-owned housing management: The case of public-private homeowners associations in Poland. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38, 2105-2127. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-023- 10025-1
  7. Muczyński, A. (2023). Potential impact of property management on the market value of dwellings in multi-owned housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38, 2207-2227. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-023-10032-2
  8. Muczyński, A. (2024). Social housing management: A long-term planning perspective on the example of a Polish municipality. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 23(4), 389-402. DOI: 10.31648/aspal.10114
  9. Nurimbetov, R.I., & Kakhramonov, K.S. (2022). Перспективы развития системы управления многоквартирным жилищным фондом в Республике Узбекистан [Prospects for the development of the multi-apartment housing stock management system in the Republic of Uzbekistan]. Жилищные стратегии, 9(3), 309- 326. DOI: 10.18334/zhs.9.3.115232
  10. Kakhramonov, K., & Muczyński, A. (2025). Transformation of the multi- owned housing stock management system: A case study of Uzbekistan. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 24(3), 393-412. DOI: 10.31648/aspal.11191

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.