KORXONA RAQOBATBARDOSHLIGINI TAʼMINLASHDA MOLIYAVIY VOSITALARNI OPTIMAL TANLASHNING USLUBIY JIHATLARI
Abstract
The article improves the multi-criteria methodology for selecting financial instruments to ensure the competitiveness of an enterprise. The study is based on the theoretical approaches of the authorʼs PhD dissertation, the financial indicators and the results of the analysis of hierarchies of “Grand Techno Master” LLC for 2018-2022. A five-stage mechanism combining financial diagnostics, expert assessment, pair comparison, integral prioritization and result monitoring is proposed. The fact that alternative K1 takes the first place with a priority of 0.452 in the AHP calculations is explained by the need to strengthen financial independence in the enterprise. In order to develop the methodology, a priority coefficient adjusted for financial risk and a decision recalibration cycle were introduced. The results show that a financial instrument should be selected comprehensively not only by the cost of capital, but also by risk, capital structure, investment objective and impact on competitiveness. The findings can be used by electrical engineering enterprises to select financing sources, balance the capital structure and improve the validity of financial decisions.Keywords
enterprise competitiveness, financial instrument, financial engineering, hierarchy analysis, AHP, financial independence, financial risk, capital structure
References
- Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844
- Feurer, R., & Chaharbaghi, K. (1994). Defining competitiveness: A holistic approach. Management Decision, 32(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749410054819
- Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
- Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press
- Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
- Sandu, S., & Ciocanel, B. (2014). Impact of R&D and innovation on high-tech export. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00450-X
- Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
- Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 - Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530- 535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
- Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: Methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(4-5), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.333
- Ансофф И. Стратегическое управление. - М.: Экономика, 1989. - 519 с
- Савицкая Г.В. Экономический анализ. 11-е изд. - М.: Новое знание, 2005
- Abdumurotov Sh.Sh. Korxona raqobatbardoshligini taʼminlashda moliyaviy vositalardan foydalanish samaradorligini oshirish: iqtisodiyot fanlari boʻyicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. - Toshkent, 2024
- Burxanov A.U. Moliyaviy xavfsizlik. - Toshkent: Iqtisodiyot, 2019. - 164 b
- Elmirzayev S.E. Korporativ moliyani boshqarishda soliq munosabatlarini takomillashtirish: iqtisodiyot fanlari doktori (DSc) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. - Toshkent, 2017
- Malikov T.S. Moliya: xoʻjalik yurituvchi subyektlar moliyasi. - Toshkent: Iqtisod-moliya, 2009
- Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti huzuridagi Statistika agentligi. Rasmiy statistik maʼlumotlar. https://stat.uz 17. 18
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.