DEVELOPING PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCING UZBEKISTAN’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE AND TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS: GAP DECOMPOSITION, INSTRUMENT COVERAGE, AND THE RANKING OF INTERVENTIONS BY IMPLEMENTATION DISTANCE

Tashkilot
Toshkent Davlat Iqtisodiyot Universiteti image/svg+xml
Marketing jurnali — 2026-yil sentabr, 9-son

Annotatsiya

Amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqiladigan maqolalarda ular odatda roʻyxat koʻrinishida beriladi. Ushbu maqolada esa tavsiyalar xuddi shu panellar boʻyicha toʻrtta hamroh tadqiqotda baholangan koeffitsiyentlar asosida tartiblanadi. Ish uchta tushunchaga tayanadi: tafovut dekompozitsiyasi, instrument qamrovi va amalga oshirish masofasi. Dekompozitsiya natijalariga koʻra, Oʻzbekiston turistlarning moddiy merosni baholashi boʻyicha benchmark medianasining 99,6 foiziga, har bir yirik tadbirga toʻgʻri keladigan tashriflar boʻyicha esa 100,0 foiziga teng, biroq onlayn faollik boʻyicha 47,2 foiz, bir tashrifdan olinadigan tushum boʻyicha 39,0 foiz darajasida turibdi. Demak, raqobatbardoshlik muammosi mahsulot sifatida emas. Zanjirning yetti boʻgʻinidan oltitasi baholangan koeffitsiyentga ega, faqat tashriflardan tushumga oʻtish boʻgʻini instrumentsiz qolgan, holbuki aynan shu boʻgʻinda yillik tafovut 2,615 mlrd AQSh dollarini tashkil etadi. Tartiblash natijasida birinchi qadam aniq boʻladi: barcha kelishuv zanjirlarini ikki bosqichga qisqartirish xalqaro eʼtiborni taxminan 30,5 foizga oshiradi va doimiy xarajat talab qilmaydi. Miqdoriy baholangan uchta chora birgalikda yiliga taxminan 251 mln AQSh dollari beradi, bu esa instrumentsiz qolgan tafovutning oʻndan biriga teng. Maqolaning asosiy tavsiyasi aynan shu nisbatdan kelib chiqadi.

Kalit so'zlar

turizm raqobatbardoshligi, milliy imij, siyosat ustuvorliklari, instrument qamrovi, amalga oshirish masofasi, choralarni tartiblash, Oʻzbekiston


Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627727
  2. Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
  3. Chalip, L. (2004). Beyond impact: A general model for sport event leverage. In B. W. Ritchie & D. Adair (Eds.), Sport Tourism: Interrelationships, Impacts and Issues (pp. 226-252). Clevedon: Channel View
  4. Crouch, G. I. (2011). Destination competitiveness: An analysis of determinant attributes. Journal of Travel Research, 50(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510362776
  5. Dwyer, L., & Kim, C. (2003). Destination competitiveness: Determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism, 6(5), 369-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500308667962
  6. Fan, Y. (2006). Branding the nation: What is being branded? Journal of Vacation Marketing, 12(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766706056633
  7. Hjalager, A.-M. (2010). A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, 31(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.012
  8. Kotler, P., & Gertner, D. (2002). Country as brand, product, and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 9(4-5), 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540076
  9. Manski, C. F. (2013). Public Policy in an Uncertain World: Analysis and Decisions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067547
  10. Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2
  11. OECD & Joint Research Centre. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en
  12. Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. I. (2003). The Competitive Destination: A Sustainable Tourism Perspective. Wallingford: CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851996646.0000
  13. Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 168(2), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x
  14. Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x
  15. Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
  16. Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831456

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.