Tel: +998977838464

Son 10 (2026)
Marketing

Ilmiy maqolalar

МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЙ ОБЗОР ОЦЕНКИ ТРАНСФОРМАЦИОННЫХ ПРОЦЕССОВ

DOI 10.67668/mj/2026iss10/2184 Betlar 40-48

Nashr qilingan 2026-10-15

Mualliflar
Кудайназарова Дилназ Кошкарбаевна
Tashkilot
Tashkent University of Information Technology image/svg+xml
Marketing — 10-son, oktabr 2026
PDF (ruscha) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Annotatsiya

Maqolada zamonaviy tashkilotlar va iqtisodiy tizimlarda texnologik, institutsional, tashkiliy va bozor omillari taʼsirida kechayotgan transformatsiya jarayonlarini baholashning nazariy-uslubiy yondashuvlari koʻrib chiqilgan. Alohida miqdoriy natijalarni baholashdan transformatsiyaning chuqurligi, tezligi, barqarorligi va natijadorligini kompleks oʻlchashga oʻtish zarurligi asoslangan. Ilmiy yondashuvlar tahlili asosida beshta asosiy blokni oʻz ichiga olgan mualliflik baholash tizimi taklif etilgan: strategik transformatsiya, tashkiliy-jarayon oʻzgarishlari, texnologik transformatsiya, inson kapitali va iqtisodiy natijadorlik. Koʻrsatkichlarni agregatlash uchun tadqiqot obyektining transformatsion yetuklik darajasini aniqlash imkonini beruvchi transformatsiya jarayonlarining integral indeksi taklif qilingan. Integral indeks dinamikasi va transformatsiya omillari tuzilmasini baholash uchun tahliliy maʼlumotlar ishlab chiqilgan. Olingan natijalar texnologik modernizatsiyaning oʻzi yuqori transformatsion samaradorlikni taʼminlamasligini koʻrsatdi: strategiya, biznesjarayonlar, inson kapitali va boshqaruv tizimining muvofiqlashtirilgan oʻzgarishi hal qiluvchi ahamiyatga ega.

Kalit so'zlar

transformatsiya jarayonlari, baholash metodologiyasi, transformatsion yetuklik, raqamli transformatsiya, tashkiliy oʻzgarishlar, integral indeks, samaradorlik, innovatsiyalar, inson kapitali

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Global Environment Facility Independent Evaluation Office. (2018). Evaluation of GEF support for transformational change (Evaluation Report No. 122). GEF IEO. https://www.gefieo.org/sites/default/files/documents/evaluations/transformational-change.pdf
  2. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press
  3. OECD. (2014). Measuring the digital economy: A new perspective. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264221796-en
  4. OECD. (2019). Measuring the digital transformation: A roadmap for the future. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311992-en
  5. OECD. (2022). The OECD Going Digital measurement roadmap (OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 328). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bd10100f-en
  6. OECD. (2026). The OECD Going Digital measurement roadmap 2026 (OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 382). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b455e132-en
  7. Rogers, D. L. (2016). The digital transformation playbook: Rethink your business for the digital age. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/roge17544
  8. Schalock, R. L., Verdugo, M. A., & van Loon, J. (2018). Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 67, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.11.003
  9. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
  10. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
  11. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Review Press
  12. World Health Organization. (2021). Evaluation of WHO transformation. WHO Evaluation Office. https://www.unevaluation.org/member_publications/evaluation-who-transformation

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.