Tel: +998901234567
Search

Son 1 (2026)
Marketing

Articles

OLIY TAʼLIM MUASSASALARIDA BARQAROR RAQOBAT USTUNLIKLARINI SHAKLLANTIRISH ASOSIDA STRATEGIK BOSHQARUVNI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH

Nashr etilgan 2026-01-31

Mualliflar
Ismailova Nilufar Sabitdjanovna
Tashkilot
Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti “Jahon iqtisodiyoti va xalqaro iqtisodiy munosabatlar” kafedrasi mudiri, professor i.f.n
PDF Google Scholar Google Scholar

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqola oliy taʼlim muassasalarida (OTM) strategik boshqaruvni takomillashtirishning nazariy -konseptual asoslarini, barqaror raqobat ustunliklarini shakllantirish orqali amalga oshirish yoʻllarini oʻrganadi. 2012 –2022 -yillarda Scopus va Web of Science bazalarida indekslangan 30 ta ilmiy manbaga asoslangan narrativ adabiyotlar sharhi orqali raqobat, raqobatbardoshlik va barqaror raqobat ustunligi tushunchalari tahlil qilinadi. Asosiy mavzular, raqobat manbalari va turlari, ularning ijobiy va salbiy oqib atlari, takomillashtirish strategiyalari hamda konseptual bogʻlanishlar koʻrib chiqiladi. Xulosalar bir -biriga mantiqiy bogʻlangan holda taqdim etilib, rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda (shu jumladan Markaziy Osiyo) nazariy asoslar takomillashtirilgan. Maqola ekonometrik tahlillarsiz, faqat nazariy va konseptual yondashuvga asoslangan.

Kalit so'zlar

strategik boshqaruv, barqaror raqobat ustunligi, oliy taʼlim muassasalari, raqobat, raqobatbardoshlik, intellektual kapital, narrativ sharh

Adabiyotlar ro'yxati

  1. Erhardt, D., von Kotzebue, A. Competition unleashed: horizontal differentiation in German higher education. Tert Educ Manag 22, 333 –358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2016.1233993
  2. Fadahunsi, T., & Pelser, T. G. (2013). Marketing practices for competitiveness in public FET colleges in Gauteng. South African Journal of Higher Education, 27(4), 838 -857.
  3. Fantauzzi, C., Frondizi, R., Colasanti, N., & Fiorani, G. (2019). Creating Value in the Entrepreneurial University: Marketization and Merchandising Strategies. Administrative Sciences, 9(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9040082
  4. Garrett -Jones, S., & Turpin, T. (2012). Globalisation and the Changing Functions of Australian Universities. Science, Technology and Society, 17(2), 233 -274. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172181101700203
  5. Ghobehei, M., Sadeghvaziri, F., Ebrahimi, E. et al. The effects of perceived brand orientation and perceived service quality in the higher education sector. Eurasian Bus Rev 9, 347–365 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821 -018-00115 -4
  6. Gruzdev, I., Terentev, E. & Dzhafarova, Z. Superhero or hands -off supervisor? An empirical categorization of PhD supervision styles and student satisfaction in Russian universities. High Educ 79, 773 –789 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734 -019-00437 -w
  7. Hammond, C.D. Internationalization, nationalism, and global competitiveness: a comparison of approaches to higher education in China and Japan. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 17, 555 –566 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564 -016-9459 -0
  8. Kabók, J., Radisic, S., & Kuzmanović, B. (2017). Cluster analysis of higher - education competitiveness in selected European countries. Economic Research -Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 845 –857. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1305783
  9. Kelly, A. (2016). Measuring research competitiveness in UK universities: introducing the Herfindahl Index to the 2008 and 2014 research assessment exercises. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1206 –1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1074979
  10. Kettunen, K., Alajoutsijärvi, K., Hunnes, J.A. et al. Emergence and early institutionalization of competition in higher education: evidence from Finnish business schools. Tert Educ Manag 29, 365 –389 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233 -022-09104 -9
  11. Krücken, G. (2021). Multiple competitions in higher education: a conceptual approach. Innovation, 23(2), 163 –181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1684652
  12. Lo, M. F., & Tian, F. (2020). Enhancing competitive advantage in Hong Kong higher education: Linking knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity and innovation capability. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(4), 426 -441.
  13. Mahdi, O. R., Nassar, I. A., & Almsafir, M. K. (2019). Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research, 94, 320 –334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.013
  14. Mahdi, O. R., & Nassar, I. A. (2021). The Business Model of Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Strategic Leadership Capabilities and Knowledge Management Processes to Overcome COVID -19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(17), 9891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179891
  15. Marulanda -Grisales, N., & Vera -Acevedo, L. D. (2023). Analysis of core competences and competitive advantages in higher education institutions: An intellectual capital approach. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(5), 957 –971. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2118636
  16. Christine Musselin, New forms of competition in higher education, Socio -Economic Review, Volume 16, Issue 3, July 2018, Pages 657 –683, https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy033 .
  17. Naidoo, R. (2018). The competition fetish in higher education: Shamans, mind snares and consequences. European Educational Research Journal, 17(5), 605 -620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118784839
  18. Neves, T., Ferraz, H., & Nata, G. (2017). Social inequality in access to higher education: grade inflation in private schools and the ineffectiveness of compensatory education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 26(2), 190 –210. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2016.1191966
  19. Ngoc, D. M. (2018). Competitive Strategies of Vietnamese Higher Educational Institutions. International Higher Education, 94, 33 –34. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2018.0.10546
  20. Panda S, Pandey SC, Bennett A, Tian X (2019), "University brand image as competitive advantage: a two -country study". International Journal of Educational Management, V ol. 33 No. 2 pp. 234 –251, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM -12-2017 -0374
  21. Abreu Pederzini, G. (2018). Neoliberal awakenings: A case study of university leadersʼ competitive advantage sensemaking. Higher Education Policy, 31(3), 405 –422. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/62885/
  22. de Matos Pedro, E., Alves, H., & Leitão, J. (2022). In search of intangible connections: intellectual capital, performance and quality of life in higher education institutions. Higher education, 83(2), 243 –260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734 -020-00653 -9
  23. Qassas, K., and A. Areiqat. 2020. “Management Intellectual Capital and Its Role in Achieving Competitive Advantages at Jordnanian Private Universities.” International Journal of Higher Education 10 (2): 92 –107. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p92
  24. Secundo, G., Perez, S. E., Martinaitis, Ž., & Leitner, K. H. (2017). An intellectual capital framework to measure universitiesʼ third mission activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 229 –239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.013 .
  25. Sergeeva, V . V . (2016). Assessing Competition on the Russian University Market Using a Modified Panzar -Rosse Model. Russian Education & Society, 58(1), 12 –29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10609393.2016.1205919
  26. Shaposhnykov , K., Shaposhnykova , I., Tanashchuk , K., Filippov , V., Hrytsku , V., & Demkiv , Y. (2022). Competitiveness of the higher education in the context of ensuring sustainable development of the state. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 44(3), 280 –287. https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.29
  27. Yahiaoui ,Hela Chebbi D, Stonkiene M, Matkeviciene R, Vaiginiene E (2016), "Evaluation of the national higher education systemʼs competitiveness: Theoretical model". Competitiveness Review, V ol. 26 No. 2 pp. 116 –131, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR -06- 2015 -0055 .
  28. Suwarno, Kamaludin, S. Widodo, and R. S. Hayu. 2021. “The Role of Performance and new Services Development on Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Indonesian Private Universities.” International Journal of EBusiness and EGovernment Studies 13 (1): 117 –41.
  29. Tan, C. L., Y. N. Goh, and H. S. Chan. 2015. “The Determinants of Competitiveness in Quality: A Study among the Malaysian Private Higher Education Institutions.” Problems and Perspectives in Management 13 (2): 371 –9.
  30. Teixeira, P.N., Rocha, V ., Biscaia, R. et al. Competition and diversity in higher education: an empirical approach to specialization patterns of Portuguese institutions. High Educ 63, 337 –352 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734 -011-9444 -9

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.