SANOAT KORXONALARIDA INNOVATSION FAOLIYATNI BOSHQARISHDA XORIJIY MAMLAKATLAR TAJRIBASI VA ENG YAXSHI AMALIYOTLAR

Tashkilot
Buxoro Xalqaro Universiteti image/svg+xml
III Bioiqtisodiyot xalqaro forumi, Buxoro, 24-25-sentabr 2026

Annotatsiya

Maqolada sanoat korxonalarida innovatsion faoliyatni boshqarishning xorijiy modellari va eng yaxshi amaliyotlari tadqiq etilgan. Germaniya, Yaponiya, Janubiy Koreya, Xitoy va AQSh tajribasi davlat, sanoat va ilm-fan hamkorligi, moliyalashtirish mexanizmlari hamda korxona ichidagi boshqaruv vositalari kesimida qiyosiy tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda tizimli yondashuv, qiyosiy va institutsional tahlil, guruhlash hamda umumlashtirish usullari qoʻllanildi. Global innovatsiyalar indeksi maʼlumotlari asosida Oʻzbekistonning innovatsion salohiyati baholangan. Natijalar Oʻzbekistonda innovatsion resurslar boʻyicha oʻrin yaxshilanayotgan boʻlsa-da, innovatsion natijalar ortda qolayotganini koʻrsatdi. Asosiy muammo korxonalarda gʻoyani tijoratlashtirilgan mahsulotga aylantiruvchi boshqaruv tizimining zaifligi ekani aniqlandi. Bosqichli qaror qabul qilish, ochiq innovatsiyalar, uzluksiz takomillashtirish, natijaga bogʻlangan moliyalashtirish va innovatsion koʻrsatkichlar tizimi eng yaxshi amaliyotlar sifatida ajratildi. Korxona darajasida innovatsion faoliyatni boshqarishning besh bosqichli modeli va xorij tajribasini Oʻzbekiston sanoat korxonalarida qoʻllash boʻyicha takliflar ishlab chiqilgan.

Kalit so'zlar

innovatsion faoliyat, sanoat korxonasi, innovatsion boshqaruv, ochiq innovatsiyalar, ilmiy-tadqiqot va tajriba-konstruktorlik ishlari (ITTKI), texnologiyalar transferi, “Sanoat 4.0”, Global innovatsiyalar indeksi


Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Asia Economy. (2026, September 9). South Korea ranks 2nd globally in R&D expenditure as share of GDP (NISTEP “Science and Technology Indicators 2026” maʼlumotlari asosida). https://view.asiae.co.kr/en/article/2026090908462467388
  2. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press
  3. A comparative study of Uzbekistanʼs innovation efficiency: Evaluating GII output-input ratios relative to leading and emerging innovative economies. (2025). Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/17697070
  4. Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I
  5. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row
  6. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  7. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2026). Institute network: Facts and figures. https://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/fokus/institute-network.html
  8. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter
  9. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japanʼs competitive success. McGraw- Hill
  10. KED Global. (2023, July 25). S.Korea relies heavily on Samsung Elec for R&D spending: FKI. https://www.kedglobal.com/newsView/ked202307250012
  11. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter
  12. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press
  13. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press
  15. Science and Technology Daily. (2026, March 13). Sci-tech force strengthened amid GDP growth in 2025. https://www.stdaily.com/web/English/2026-03/11/content_484024.html
  16. Siddikova, S., Xolmurotov, F., Nutfullaeva, L., et al. (2026). R&D expenditure and nominal GDP growth in Uzbekistan: Exploratory evidence from first difference and distributed lag models. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 24(3), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.46
  17. WIPO. (2025a). Global Innovation Index 2025: Switzerland, Sweden, US, the Republic of Korea and Singapore top ranking; China enters top 10. https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2025/article_0009.html
  18. WIPO. (2025b). Uzbekistan ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2025. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2025/uz.pdf
  19. Xinhua. (2025, September 29). Chinaʼs R&D spending reports steady growth in 2024. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202509/29/content_WS68da7d8ec6d00ca5f9a06888.html
  20. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining 2020-yil 24-iyul OʻRQ-630-son “Innovatsion faoliyat toʻgʻrisida”gi Qonuni. https://lex.uz/docs/4910391
  21. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 16-fevral 2026-yil PF-21-son “Mamlakat taraqqiyotining 2030-yilgacha moʻljallangan ustuvor yoʻnalishlari doirasida islohotlarni izchil davom ettirish va yangi bosqichga olib chiqishning qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida” Farmoni https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-8050769
  22. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 6-iyul PF-165-son “2022- 2026-yillarda Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining innovatsion rivojlanish strategiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida”gi Farmoni. https://lex.uz/docs/6102462

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.