Tel: +998977838464

2026
III Bioiqtisodiyot xalqaro forumi: maxsus son

III-SEKSIYA - SIRKULYAR IQTISODIYOT VA BIOMASSADAN SAMARALI FOYDALANISH TAJRIBASI HAMDA INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALARNI ALMASHISH

CIRCULAR APPROACHES TO AGRICULTURAL WASTE MANAGEMENT: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GERMANY, CHINA, INDIA, THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UZBEKISTAN

DOI 10.67668/mj/2026issmaxsus/2051 Betlar 139-151

Nashr qilingan 2026-09-25

Mualliflar
Zulfina Nazirova
Tashkilot
Buxoro davlat universiteti image/svg+xml
III Bioiqtisodiyot xalqaro forumi, Buxoro, 24-25-sentabr 2026
PDF (inglizcha) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Annotatsiya

Maqolada qishloq xo‘jaligi chiqindilarini sirkulyar iqtisodiyot tamoyillari asosida boshqarish yondashuvlari Germaniya, Xitoy, Hindiston, Yevropa Ittifoqi va O‘zbekiston misolida qiyosiy o‘rganildi. Ilmiy adabiyotlar, institutsional hisobotlar, davlat hujjatlari va statistik ma’lumotlar tizimlashtirildi. O‘simlik qoldiqlari, chorvachilik chiqindilari va qayta ishlash yonaki mahsulotlaridan kompost, bioo‘g‘it, yem hamda bioenergiya olish yo‘nalishlari taqqoslandi. Texnologiyalarni sifat standartlari, moliyaviy rag‘batlar, infratuzilma va bozor mexanizmlari bilan uyg‘unlashtirishning ahamiyati yoritildi. O‘zbekiston uchun biologik resurslar oqimlarini yaxlit boshqarishga asoslangan konseptual yondashuv taklif etildi. Alohida yig‘ish, biogaz ishlab chiqarish, raqamli monitoring va hududiy sirkulyar klasterlarni rivojlantirish bo‘yicha tavsiyalar shakllantirildi. Buxoro viloyatida tajriba loyihalarini tashkil etish imkoniyatlari ko‘rib chiqildi. Resurs salohiyatini aniqlash uchun alohida miqdoriy baholash zarurligi ta’kidlandi.

Kalit so'zlar

qishloq xo‘jaligi chiqindilari, sirkulyar iqtisodiyot, biologik resurslar, kompostlash, bioo‘g‘it, biogaz, raqamli monitoring, hududiy klasterlar

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

  1. Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hettiarachchi, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019). Crop residue burning in India: Policy challenges and potential solutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(5), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16050832
  2. Department of Information and Publicity, Government of Goa. (2024). Burning crop residues harms environment
  3. Duque-Acevedo, M., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Cortés-García, F. J., & Camacho- Ferre, F. (2020). Agricultural waste: Review of the evolution, approaches and perspectives on alternative uses. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e00902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00902
  4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Vol. 1: An economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation
  5. European Commission. (n.d.). CAP and the environment: An environmentally sustainable Common Agricultural Policy. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
  6. European Commission. (n.d.). Clean air - Agriculture and rural development. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
  7. European Commission. (n.d.). Soil - Agriculture and rural development. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development
  8. European Commission. (2025). Bioeconomy strategy: Strategy for a competitive and sustainable EU bioeconomy. European Commission
  9. Government of India, Press Information Bureau. (2024). Air pollution caused by stubble burning. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
  10. Government of India, Press Information Bureau. (2026). Initiatives taken to integrate bioenergy for mitigation of air pollution and augment waste management strategies
  11. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
  12. Koul, B., Yakoob, M., & Shah, M. P. (2022). Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environmental Research, 206, 112285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112285
  13. Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Third Nationally Determined Contribution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. UNFCCC
  14. Scenario-based synergistic assessment of crop straw allocation for GHG mitigation and sustainable resource use in China. (2026). ScienceDirect
  15. Statistics Agency under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025). Total volume of agricultural production (annual). SIAT Open Data
  16. Tang, Z., Zhang, X., Chen, R., Ge, C., Tang, J., Du, Y., Jiang, P., Fang, X., Zheng, H., & Zhang, C. (2024). A comprehensive assessment of rice straw returning in China based on life cycle assessment method: Implications on soil, crops, and environment. Agriculture, 14(7), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14070972
  17. Umweltbundesamt. (2025). Bioabfälle. German Environment Agency
  18. Velasco-Muñoz, J. F., Mendoza, J. M. F., Aznar-Sánchez, J. A., & Gallego- Schmid, A. (2021). Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: Definition, strategies and indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105618
  19. Wang, Q., Qin, Y., Wei, Y., Ye, S., Wang, Y., Tong, T., Ji, Z., & Ouyang, Y. (2025). Key technologies and equipment for straw utilization in agriculture. Agronomy, 15(9), 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15092219
  20. World Bank. (2024). Circular economy as an opportunity for Central Asia. World Bank
  21. Resolution of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PQ-4477 of October 4, 2019 “On approval of the Strategy for the transition of the Republic of Uzbekistan to a green economy for the period 2019-2030”. https://lex.uz/docs/4539502

Yuklab olishlar

Yuklab olish ma’lumotlari hali mavjud emas.