ANALYSIS OF TOURISTS’ATTITUDES TOWARD CULTURAL EXPERIENCES: ENDORSEMENT CONCENTRATION THRESHOLDS, ENGAGEMENT AND VALENCE CONVERSION, AND INTERPRETIVE MEDIATION IN THE PERCEPTION OF NATIONAL HERITAGE

Affiliation
Tashkent State University of Economics image/svg+xml

Abstract

Heritage policy is built on the premise that the significance of a monument governs how visitors respond to it. This article tests that premise on a panel of twenty heritage sites in Uzbekistan and a thirteen-country benchmark, using three constructs: the concentration of articulated endorsement relative to the visits that produce it, the decomposition of visitor response into engagement conversion and valence conversion, and interpretive mediation, a construct introduced here to score the degree to which a site supplies a structured narrative rather than bare fabric. The premise does not survive. Heritage significance grade accounts for 2.0 per cent of the variation in the share of five-star reviews across sites, with a coefficient of 0.092 and a t statistic of 0.61, and it remains statistically indistinguishable from zero in every specification of the nested ladder. Interpretive provision accounts for 75.9 per cent, and one step on its three-point scale multiplies the odds of a five-star review by 1.69. The comparison is close to matched: sites with full narrative interpretation and sites left as bare fabric carry an identical mean significance grade of 4.00 and differ by 29.0 percentage points in endorsement, with a Welch statistic of 7.41. The group holding the most significant sites in the panel ranks second, not first. Uzbekistan sits at the benchmark median on how tourists rate its heritage and ninth of thirteen on how much they say about it, at 47 per cent of the median review volume per inscribed property. The article reads this as evidence that significance is a credence attribute that cannot enter evaluation until interpretation converts it into an experience attribute, and it sets out what follows for site management.

Keywords

heritage tourism, visitor attitudes, interpretation, credence attributes, online reviews, conversion efficiency, Uzbekistan


References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317-372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
  3. Chen, C.-F., & Chen, F.-S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.02.008
  4. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  5. Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973). Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud. Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67-88. https://doi.org/10.1086/466756
  6. Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 49(10), 1407-1424. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
  7. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading: Addison-Wesley
  8. Gini, C. (1912). Variabilità e Mutabilità. Bologna: Tipografia di Paolo Cuppini
  9. Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation: Making a Difference on Purpose. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing
  10. Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. American Economic Review, 54(5), 761-762
  11. Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2009). Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews. Communications of the ACM, 52(10), 144-147. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562764.1562800
  12. ICOMOS. (1964). International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter). Venice: ICOMOS
  13. ICOMOS. (2008). Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Quebec: International Council on Monuments and Sites
  14. Luca, M., & Zervas, G. (2016). Fake it till you make it: Reputation, competition, and Yelp review fraud. Management Science, 62(12), 3412-3427. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2304
  15. Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421-2455. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2421
  16. Moscardo, G. (1996). Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 376-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00068-2
  17. Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/259630
  18. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  19. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 97-105
  20. Poria, Y., Butler, R., & Airey, D. (2003). The core of heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00064-6
  21. Poria, Y., Reichel, A., & Biran, A. (2006). Heritage site management: Motivations and expectations. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(1), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.001
  22. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
  23. Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting Our Heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press
  24. Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2003). Heritage Tourism. Harlow: Prentice Hall
  25. Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict. Chichester: Wiley
  26. UNESCO. (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO
  27. Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of Student’s problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1-2), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28
  28. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.