Tel: +998977838464

No. 8 (2026)
Marketing

Scientific articles

MINTAQAVIY IQTISODIY RIVOJLANISHNI RAQAMLI MONITORING QILISHNING INSTITUTSIONAL ARXITEKTURASI. XALQARO TAJRIBA VA OʻZBEKISTON UCHUN ADAPTIV YONDASHUVLAR

DOI 10.67668/mj/2026iss8/2093 Pages 458-473

Published 2026-08-30

Authors
Qozaqova Munojat Sharifjanovna
Affiliation
Namangan State Technical University image/svg+xml
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

The article examines the institutional architecture of digital monitoring of regional economic development, its structural elements and the functional links between levels of governance. Drawing on international experience, it systematizes the role of multilevel governance, territorial data integration, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms in regional policy. For Uzbekistan, an adaptive approach is proposed that rests on stronger institutional cooperation between the state, regional authorities, the statistical system and digital platforms. Conceptual directions for integrating the results of digital monitoring into regional management decisions are substantiated. The study compares the number of internet subscribers, mobile coverage and the volume of information and communication services across the regions of Uzbekistan in 2016-2025 and separately assesses the ten-year dynamics of Namangan region. The results show that nationwide the number of internet subscribers grew 3.76 times and the volume of information and communication services 12.60 times, while substantial regional gaps persist. On this basis, an adaptive model is proposed in which uniform data standards and methodology are set at the central level, while analytical and decision-making powers are strengthened at the regional level.

Keywords

regional economy, digital monitoring, institutional architecture, regional development, multilevel governance, territorial data, digital platform, adaptive governance

References

  1. Benner, M. (2022). An institutionalist perspective on smart specialization: Towards a political economy of regional innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 49(6), 878-889. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac035
  2. Gianelle, C., Guzzo, F., & Mieszkowski, K. (2024). The governance of regional innovation policy and its economic implications. The Annals of Regional Science, 72(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01241-2
  3. Kleibrink, A., Gianelle, C., & Doussineau, M. (2016). Monitoring innovation and territorial development in Europe: Emergent strategic management. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1438-1458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1181717
  4. Meyer, C. (2020). Reinforcing comparative monitoring of Smart Specialisation performance across European regions: Transnational RIS3 observatory model as a tool for Smart Specialisation governance. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(2), 1386-1400. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(81)
  5. Moujaes, G. (2024). Moving to Smart Specialization for sustainability: The implications on the design of monitoring indicators. Science and Public Policy, 51(1), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad056
  6. OECD. (2023). Recommendation of the Council on Regional Development Policy. Paris: OECD
  7. OECD. (2025). Implementation Toolkit: OECD Recommendation on Regional Development Policy. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/implementing-the-oecd-recommendation-on-regional-development-policy-toolkit.html
  8. Pinto, H. (2024). Universities and institutionalization of regional innovation policy in peripheral regions: Insights from the smart specialization in Portugal. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(1), 12659. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12659
  9. Pinto, H., Laranja, M., & Uyarra, E. (2024). Smart specialization, public authorities, and innovation intermediaries in developing regions. Regional Sustainability, 5(4), 100175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100175
  10. Trippl, M., Zukauskaite, E., & Healy, A. (2020). Shaping smart specialization: The role of place-specific factors in advanced, intermediate and less-developed European regions. Regional Studies, 54(10), 1328-1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1582763
  11. United Nations Development Programme. (2025). Institutionalizing M&E for Uzbekistanʼs Digital Transformation. Tashkent: UNDP Uzbekistan
  12. Wibisono, E. (2022). Multilevel governance and Smart Specialization in EU regions: An evidence-based critical review. European Journal of Government and Economics, 11(2), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2022.11.2.9004
  13. World Bank. (2025). GovTech Maturity Index 2025: Tracking Public Sector Digital Transformation Worldwide. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099121725193511608
  14. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 5-oktabr PF-6079-son “«Raqamli Oʻzbekiston — 2030» strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi Farmoni. https://lex.uz/docs/-5030957
  15. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2026-yil 24-iyul PF-141-son Farmoni
  16. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2025-yil 16-sentabr PQ-286-son “Respublikaning hudud, soha va tarmoqlarida raqamli texnologiyalar joriy etilishini yanada jadallashtirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi Qarori. https://lex.uz/docs/-7730357
  17. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2026-yil 5-mart 93-son Qarori
  18. BMT Taraqqiyot dasturi. (2025). Monitoring va baholash (M&E) boʻyicha metodologik qoʻllanma. Toshkent: BMT Taraqqiyot dasturi

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.