Tel: +998977838464

2026
III International Bioeconomy Forum: Special Issue

I-SEKSIYA - GLOBAL VA MINTAQAVIY BARQAROR RIVOJLANISHNING SIYOSATI, TAJRIBA VA STRATEGIYALARINI MUHOKAMA QILISH

SANOAT KORXONALARIDA INNOVATSION FAOLIYATNI BOSHQARISHDA XORIJIY MAMLAKATLAR TAJRIBASI VA ENG YAXSHI AMALIYOTLAR

DOI 10.67668/mj/2026issmaxsus/2023 Pages 92-103

Published 2026-09-25

Authors
Ochilova Dilfuza Toyirovna
Affiliation
Bukhara International University image/svg+xml
III Bioiqtisodiyot xalqaro forumi, Buxoro, 24-25-sentabr 2026
PDF (Uzbek) Google Scholar Google Scholar

Abstract

The article studies foreign models and best practices of managing innovation activity in industrial enterprises. The experience of Germany, Japan, South Korea, China and the USA is compared in terms of government-industry-science cooperation, financing mechanisms and in-company management tools. The study applies a systems approach, comparative and institutional analysis, grouping and generalisation. Uzbekistanʼs innovation potential is assessed using Global Innovation Index data. The results show that while Uzbekistanʼs position in innovation inputs is improving, innovation outputs are lagging behind. The main problem is found to be the weakness of enterprise management systems that turn ideas into commercialised products. Stage-gate decision-making, open innovation, continuous improvement, results-based financing and an innovation indicator system are identified as best practices. A fivestage model of innovation management at the enterprise level and recommendations for applying foreign experience in Uzbek industrial enterprises are proposed.

Keywords

innovation activity, industrial enterprise, innovation management, open innovation, R&D, technology transfer, Industry 4.0, Global Innovation Index

References

  1. Asia Economy. (2026, September 9). South Korea ranks 2nd globally in R&D expenditure as share of GDP (NISTEP “Science and Technology Indicators 2026” maʼlumotlari asosida). https://view.asiae.co.kr/en/article/2026090908462467388
  2. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press
  3. A comparative study of Uzbekistanʼs innovation efficiency: Evaluating GII output-input ratios relative to leading and emerging innovative economies. (2025). Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/17697070
  4. Cooper, R. G. (1990). Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products. Business Horizons, 33(3), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I
  5. Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Harper & Row
  6. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  7. Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. (2026). Institute network: Facts and figures. https://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/en/fokus/institute-network.html
  8. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter
  9. Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japanʼs competitive success. McGraw- Hill
  10. KED Global. (2023, July 25). S.Korea relies heavily on Samsung Elec for R&D spending: FKI. https://www.kedglobal.com/newsView/ked202307250012
  11. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter
  12. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press
  13. OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
  14. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press
  15. Science and Technology Daily. (2026, March 13). Sci-tech force strengthened amid GDP growth in 2025. https://www.stdaily.com/web/English/2026-03/11/content_484024.html
  16. Siddikova, S., Xolmurotov, F., Nutfullaeva, L., et al. (2026). R&D expenditure and nominal GDP growth in Uzbekistan: Exploratory evidence from first difference and distributed lag models. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 24(3), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(3).2026.46
  17. WIPO. (2025a). Global Innovation Index 2025: Switzerland, Sweden, US, the Republic of Korea and Singapore top ranking; China enters top 10. https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/articles/2025/article_0009.html
  18. WIPO. (2025b). Uzbekistan ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2025. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/gii-ranking/2025/uz.pdf
  19. Xinhua. (2025, September 29). Chinaʼs R&D spending reports steady growth in 2024. https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/statistics/202509/29/content_WS68da7d8ec6d00ca5f9a06888.html
  20. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining 2020-yil 24-iyul OʻRQ-630-son “Innovatsion faoliyat toʻgʻrisida”gi Qonuni. https://lex.uz/docs/4910391
  21. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 16-fevral 2026-yil PF-21-son “Mamlakat taraqqiyotining 2030-yilgacha moʻljallangan ustuvor yoʻnalishlari doirasida islohotlarni izchil davom ettirish va yangi bosqichga olib chiqishning qoʻshimcha chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida” Farmoni https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-8050769
  22. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2022-yil 6-iyul PF-165-son “2022- 2026-yillarda Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining innovatsion rivojlanish strategiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida”gi Farmoni. https://lex.uz/docs/6102462

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.